> 2008/6/2 Nagy Gabor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >> @@ -861,7 +823,43 @@ int pacman_sync(alpm_list_t *targets) > >> return(sync_list(sync_dbs, targets)); > >> } > >> > >> - return(0); > >> + if(targets == NULL) { > >> + if(config->op_s_sync) { > >> + return(0); > > > > I may overlook something, but won't this break -Syu? > > > > Oops, you are right, good catch. > I probably got confused because op_s_sync used to get resetted after > doing the -y operation, but I removed that part : > - config->op_s_sync = 0; > > So now, I could probably just invert the order of these two checks : > do s_upgrade check first, then s_sync. > Does that sound alright? >
Yes. Bye ---------------------------------------------------- SZTE Egyetemi Könyvtár - http://www.bibl.u-szeged.hu This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/ _______________________________________________ pacman-dev mailing list pacman-dev@archlinux.org http://archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/pacman-dev