Dan McGee wrote: > This presents plenty of problems on OSes besides Linux, and even on Linux > when the libtool file for libarchive isn't present. The static build isn't > all that useful anyway as missing something such as glibc will still leave > you unable to run the pacman.static binary. Remove it from the formal build > process. >
I didn't realize that is was not very static. But is this not useful for people who want to try and upgrade their really old systems? I suppose if they can't get pacman going in the first place then they will be reasonably screwed with the rest of the upgrade. _______________________________________________ pacman-dev mailing list [email protected] http://archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/pacman-dev
