On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 07:05:43AM -0500, Dan McGee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 3:01 AM, Miklos Vajna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 08:01:59PM -0500, Dan McGee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> >> # get setup correct
> >> sudo rm
> >> /var/lib/pacman/sync/{community,extra,pacman-git,testing,unstable}/.lastupdate
> >
> > Ouch, this is ugly. Why not using -Syy?
>
> Are you really critiquing a bisect script? I don't know why I'm giving
> the time of day to this, but I'll bite.Should I next time just ask, without stating the reason I ask? ;-) > This script was designed to find the problem that occurred *only* on > -Syu and not -Su. Thus, a -Syy followed by and -Syu (which would > update zero databases) would not trigger the problem. I just thought -Syyu would work in that case, and wondered if there is a reason for doing so (read: learn from you as I suspected you know something that may be interesting). Thanks.
pgpP1SrlL0Tm6.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ pacman-dev mailing list [email protected] http://archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/pacman-dev
