> I think I was not very clear and transformed Dan's words too much. No, I've read that mail, and I reflected to point 2. (which I may misinterpreted: probably Dan don't like them on _upgrade_? Btw, packagers: we have pre/post_install and pre/post_upgrade "scriptlets").
> I just talked with him and we agree on these two things : > 1) printing optdepends is fine. > I actually asked an user to write a feature request : > http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/10630 , and I even assigned it to me. > But then I ran into annoying problems. Please help, since you care > about this issue. Hm. I've missed that FR, thanks. > 2) messages like "check .pacnew file for new options" are useless. > pacman already prints a warning when extracting pacnew files anyway. > And you said yourself it might be overkill, so it shouldn't be a > problem. > OK. No problem, I wasn't sure about it neither. I just noted, that some "lazy" users may notice behaviour change (missing SyncFirst option) after upgrade. Bye _______________________________________________ pacman-dev mailing list pacman-dev@archlinux.org http://archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/pacman-dev