Aaron Griffin wrote:
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 1:16 AM, Bryan Ischo
<[email protected]> wrote:
Hi all. I've noticed that other commits have gone into the pacman master
repository (what is the exact git terminology for the master repository?)
but that the patches that I sent to the list have not.
Are mine going in? Or is the team waiting on something from me? Or have my
patches been rejected? My most recent emails should have patches which
easily and cleanly apply to the tree.
It usually depends on patch size and complexity. I didn't review your
patches, but I looked at them and they were fairly involved. I
imagine, in order to ensure everything is OK, the review might take a
little longer.
Don't get discouraged, though. I sent a like 5 line patch to the list
that Dan forgot about 8)
Are there any of those patches that can be merged individually? Or are
they a big series of patches that kind of depend on each other?
There were four patches, the first three of which built on one another,
and the last one was an unrelated documentation change.
I broke them up into the smallest patches I could, which is why there
were 3. I am not sure if you followed the discussion, but I ended up
re-implementing my changes in a more concise and simpler way which is
why it's now 3 (+1 doc patch) smaller patches instead of 4 (+1 doc
patch) bigger patches.
I'll be patient and just wait to hear something about the patches.
Thanks,
Bryan
_______________________________________________
pacman-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/pacman-dev
