Loui Chang wrote:
Signed-off-by: Loui Chang <[email protected]>
---
doc/PKGBUILD.5.txt | 14 +++++++-------
doc/makepkg.8.txt | 2 +-
doc/repo-add.8.txt | 8 +-------
3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
This patch along with an asciidoc patch
(http://hg.sharesource.org/asciidoc/rev/1dfa7028bbb3) remove all
warnings for me and I notice no problem with man pages afterwards.
diff --git a/doc/PKGBUILD.5.txt b/doc/PKGBUILD.5.txt
index f8ed7f2..9e271af 100644
--- a/doc/PKGBUILD.5.txt
+++ b/doc/PKGBUILD.5.txt
@@ -65,19 +65,19 @@ similar to `$_basekernver`.
This field specifies the license(s) that apply to the package.
Commonly-used licenses are found in '/usr/share/licenses/common'. If you
see the package's license there, simply reference it in the license
- field (e.g. `$$license=('GPL')$$`). If the package provides a license
not
+ field (e.g. $$license=('GPL')$$). If the package provides a license not
What were the back-ticks attempting to do in these cases? Are we losing
anything?
<snip>
Name
----
-////
-* If we use this below line, the manpage name comes out all weird. We also
-* can't use two separate lines, which is quite annoying. *
-repo-add, repo-remove - package database maintenance utilities
-////
-repo-add - package database maintenance utility
-
+repo-add - repo-remove - package database maintenance utilities
This looks a bit strange with the dash separating repo-add and
repo-remove. Most other man pages for multiple things use commas to
separate the names then a dash before the description. It would be good
to be consistent...
Allan
_______________________________________________
pacman-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/pacman-dev
