Hi! IMHO the default no answer is better. If pacman is invoked with --noconfirm (see scripts), it is unpredictable what will happen. By the way, I _want_ to install the specified packages, so by default, I would say no.
However, then it is not possible to test the remove_unresolvable feature with pactest :-(. [In fact, this problem appeared when I tested "-S and -U merge" with our testsuite (I proudly announce, that it seems to work and the patch sum is -100 lines), and the unresolvable targets were removed with -U as well.] Opinions? _______________________________________________ pacman-dev mailing list pacman-dev@archlinux.org http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/pacman-dev
