On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 12:34 AM, Pierre Schmitz<[email protected]> wrote: > On Wednesday 17 June 2009 07:27:11 Aaron Griffin wrote: >> As a rather wild aside here... what would be the downside of sticking >> the entire PKGBUILD in the pacman DB? How much size would that add? > > Wont make that much sense (as it is not easily parsable and without patches > etc. quite useless) However for community/ core/ extra/ kde-unstable/ > local/ testing/ it is (gzip compressed) 1,1M > > But you're just kidding, right?
Not exactly - I'm half serious. I mean, a) it'd give us all the information needed to build the package, b) it'd allow these scripts to work without an ABS tree. I'm not saying pacman would _use_ it, I just think it'd be kinda neat. _______________________________________________ pacman-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/pacman-dev
