Dan McGee wrote:
On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 2:19 PM, Cedric Staniewski <[email protected]> wrote:
Xavier wrote:
On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 7:42 PM, Cedric Staniewski <[email protected]> wrote:
When using the --allsource option, it was assumed that remote source
files reside in SRCDEST which is not necessarily always the case.

I am not familiar with the code, but why aren't all source files in srcdest ?
I thought and assumed they were.
If SRCDEST is defined in makepkg.conf, there are actually two possible 
locations where (remote) source files can be saved to. They can either reside 
in the configured SRCDEST (which is where makepkg puts downloaded sources) or 
in the same directory as the PKGBUILD, and moreover, the file in the PKGBUILD 
directory is favored over the one in SRCDEST.

Several functions (check_checksums, extract_sources and probably more) use 
something like the following to get the correct file name:

                              if [ ! -f "$file" ] ; then
                                      if [ ! -f "$SRCDEST/$file" ] ; then
                                              echo "$(gettext "NOT FOUND")" >&2
                                              errors=1
                                              found=0
                                      else
                                              file="$SRCDEST/$file"
                                      fi
                              fi
This bug can be easily confirmed by running makepkg --allsource in a PKGBUILD 
directory (obviously the PKGBUILD should use remote sources), extract the 
generated source package, remove the sources of this package from SRCDEST if 
defined in makepkg.conf, change into the extracted directory and run makepkg 
--allsource (-f) again.

So rather than adding more of this code elsewhere, can we maybe factor
some of this out into a function? It would also be better to use
$startdir/$file to prevent relative path issues from biting us.

I'm envisioning some sort of function that takes any item from the
source array (url or filename) and returns a absolute file path or
something if the file isn't in either of the two places. Does this
seem plausible?

That sounds good to me. It would be worth scanning the code to check there is nowhere else where we could do this too.

Allan


Reply via email to