On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 2:10 PM, Moritz Wilhelmy <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello, > > since I started to dig into pacman's code, I've also started to wonder why > exactly libalpm reinvents the wheel by using it's own list implementation > rather than sys/queue.h (see QUEUE(3) for details). Is it for backwards > compatibility or what are the exact reasons to handle it this way?
Things I can think of off the top of my head, although I do not know the thinking process way back when: 1. It isn't POSIX 2. I don't see any sort of search/sort/merge functionality, which we use for some very key pieces of code 3. It seems woefully unrich in some features and it isn't clear how to extend it -Dan
