On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 8:23 PM, Dan McGee <dpmc...@gmail.com> wrote: > On second thought, I think I've ripped apart my own branches on this > very issue several times, so don't think that just any code is going > to be good enough to get in. This is tricky stuff, especially when > balancing being both non-obtrusive yet still secure.
I agree completely. The most we think about the issue, the better the implementation. I am would like to wait more so that other people can read the proposal and see failing points or suggest the missing parts too. -- A: Because it obfuscates the reading. Q: Why is top posting so bad? ------------------------------------------- Denis A. Altoe Falqueto -------------------------------------------