On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 5:14 PM, Dan McGee <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 1:48 AM, Allan McRae <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> In fact, thinking about this more. Bash-4.1 was released on 2010-01-03 so >> it will have been out for ~6 months before the next pacman release. Anyone >> upgrading their package manager from 3.3 -> 3.4 will upgrade bash from 4.0 >> -> 4.1 so this is probably a non-issue. >> >> So I will accept this patch when the comment above and "stray" ! is removed >> with it. > > You are assuming Arch users only here; has Cygwin and OS X moved from > bash 3.X to 4.X yet? I'd rather not break this just for the sake of > getting this patch in. > > -Dan > >
Damn I knew there was some mails I meant to reply and forgot about. If it's that easy to remain compatibility with bash 3, better keep it that way. IMO it's fine to drop support for bash 3 as soon as it becomes a burden and we have a good reason for requiring bash 4. But that does not seem to be the case for now.
