On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 2:20 PM, Allan McRae <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 23/05/10 20:58, Andres P wrote:
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Andres P<[email protected]>
>> ---
>
> -1 from me.  The new function does two things that are completely unrelated
> apart from the regex they use.  It makes no sense to combine them.  Also the
> function name does not reflect what it does at all.
>
> There is a limit to how much code refactoring is useful.  It needs to be
> balanced by readability.
>

There is a double combination in that patch.
IMO one of them is fine, the one that combines install and changelog
in a for loop.
And that combination could be done in the two places, but keeping them separate.

Reply via email to