On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 10:00 AM, Allan McRae <[email protected]> wrote: > I think I have found the issue here. We obviously have a NOPASSWD entry in > our sudoers file so "sudo -l" does not require a password. > > So the bug is confirmed. However the fix is not fully functional as if I > have sudo installed but can not use it for pacman, then I can no longer fall > back to using "su -c". I'd choose excess password typing over functionality > loss. > Eureka! I was just about to mail the sudo maintainer.
Anyhow, What if there's a check for sudo's retval like I posted in the comments? Andres P
