On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 8:54 PM, Florian Pritz <bluew...@server-speed.net> wrote: > On 13.08.2010 20:42, Xavier Chantry wrote: >> On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 1:46 PM, Allan McRae <al...@archlinux.org> wrote: >>>> >>>> I got a conflict too. pacman 3.4.0-2 >>> >>> Great, I am not going mad. But not great, something strange is >>> happening... >>> >> >> Can you show debug output ? >> And libelf is not in any of your sync repo, ie pacman -Si libelf does >> not return anything ? > > According to my (some hours old) database it has been in core. >
Well the code does this (sync.c) : /* Search for literal then replacers in each sync database. * If found, don't check other databases */ So if the literal (libelf) still exists in the db, the replacer (elfutils) isn't even considered. But it's then pulled as a dep for gcc, thus the conflict message.