Allan McRae wrote: > > This is actually clearer than it used to be now that it includes the > repo name in the query. From memory, it used to ask if you wanted > to install all packages from base-devel twice in situations like > this. > > I still wonder if it is possible to just have one query for this? I > seem to remember investigating that in the past and deciding it was > beyond me but maybe with the new group code... >
I thought that was covered by your answer one week ago : - me: hey - question from jakob - Why would you ever only install core/base-devel without testing/base-devel if - you have the testing repo enabled? In my opinion it's just weird having to go - through the 'Install all from group / install individual pkg' step twice. - - Allan: I tend to agree... - but that is just thinking about the arch repos... - what if you have a third party repo with a group that has the same name as in - another third party repo - weird but possible? > > I agree that is a clyde problem and not something we should worry about. > It would be bad to push a minor release that break some frontends though. However if we make sure that the whole 3 frontends (clyde, shaman, pyalpmm*, any others) don't fail hard on unknown callbacks but ignore them instead, it's fine.