On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 3:26 PM, Aaron Griffin <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 3:24 PM, Dan McGee <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 3:18 PM, Gaetan Bisson <[email protected]> wrote: >>> [2011-03-16 15:10:08 -0500] Dan McGee: >>>> 2. This is a terrible bug report. :/ I need output when you run this >>>> by hand, maybe with --debug, etc. Help me help you by actually >>>> providing details. >>> >>> I thought it was reproducible well enough. There is no debug output: >>> >>> yes | pacman -S --debug >>> >>> prints nothing and just eats up RAM. I will try to investigate more and >>> let you know if I find anything. >> >> Damn! This is a huge regression disguised as a "feature" that I never >> quite felt comfortable with... >> http://projects.archlinux.org/pacman.git/commit/?id=4fb3cfc48f626f84329c78351d6a8710255a35e3 > > You can do it "GNU style" and only read from stdin if the package list is "-"
OMG, Aaron is here! That sounds like the way to go, or we are going to cause regressions to anyone that expected prior behavior. Dave- does that make sense, only read from stdin if an '-' arg is provided? -Dan
