On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 7:05 PM, Dan McGee <[email protected]> wrote:
> What do you mean by "requirement"? All the tools we ship will provide
> it, but since we aren't even verifying it yet in pacman code, that
> will need to be added first.

I meant to say that I think the SHA256 checks should be a part of
"what needs to be done before we can consider signing to be fully
implementented", that's all.

-Kerrick Staley

Reply via email to