On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 7:20 AM, Florian Pritz <bluew...@xinu.at> wrote: > On 13.03.2012 12:05, Allan McRae wrote: >> I do understand the branch name is useless once you have a tag/commit >> id. That is why later in the email I said it only really serves as >> documentation. > > Use comments for that.
So just how do you propose using a comment to describe origin/maint in the pacman repository to build my pacman-maint-git package? I don't follow this logic one bit...you clearly need to use a branch name, not some arbitrary sha1 that never moves forward with new commits... -Dan