On 07/04/13 20:10, Xavion wrote: > Hi All, > > It's great that "pacman" finally has native colour support in v4.1.0. It's > just a shame that it's not as good as that of "pacman-color". Without > meaning any offence, it falls way short of the mark IMHO. > > I'm hoping you can just replicate the colourisation of "pacman-color". For > your convenience, I've attached the relevant files you'd need. I'm only > requesting this because "pacman-color" no longer exists. >
That patch is a steaming pile of hackery. So the color output needed to be rewritten to become included in pacman. Rather than just attaching a ~1300 line file that no longer applies in any way and stating that it is better, you might like to actually state what is currently missing? Allan
