Am 23.05.2014 07:32, schrieb Allan McRae: >>> - if ! $decompress < "$sourcefile" | gpg --quiet --batch >>> --status-file "$statusfile" --verify "$file" - 2> /dev/null; then >>> + $decompress < "$sourcefile" | gpg --quiet --batch --status-file >>> "$statusfile" --verify "$file" - 2> /dev/null > > Comment added: > > # these variables are assigned values in parse_gpg_statusfile > >>> + success=0 >>> + status= >>> + pubkey= >>> + parse_gpg_statusfile "$statusfile" >> >> Before this actually gets merged, could we add a comment that >> parse_gpg_statusfile modifies the "local" variables success, status, >> and pubkey? This behavior is non-obvious and makes the following test >> confusing.
I don't particularly like this method. Is there a more obvious method for passing this data?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
