On 20/02/16 14:08, Allan McRae wrote: > On 20/02/16 00:18, Dominik Fischer wrote: >> I did not know that despite git-based AUR 4 source packages are still in >> active use. There, time stamps make some sense indeed. > > FYI: ABS will be replace by source package repos at some stage. Also, > not every distribution using pacman is Arch. > > Patch queued for 5.0.1. >
On second thoughts... provide an actual git patch and not a hand-crafted one that does not apply. A
