Hi Allan, I have become old and grumpy since then! >
Okay, point taken: I did let it drag on a bit. It wasn't all my fault, though: I got sick of waiting for those other three patches to be merged in. > Lets start with what is already justified by what we already have in > pacman with the aim of improving consistency of our current colour > scheme. Further additions will need to be discussed separately. > > package names - bold (in some places...) > groups - blue > repos - magenta > versions - green > > So, I'd like separate patches: > > -Si/-Qi: just those changes > -S group dialog: just those changes > Righto, you're the boss. I've just created a patch for those switches alone; I will post it to this thread soon. I'll get back to you about the other colours at a later date. > -Qo/-Fo can have the same done > and anywhere else that is currently not consistent. > As far as I can tell, the following switches need better colourisation. Let me know if you disagree with any of this *before* I go ahead and create the patch :-). - -Dk, -Dkk: the package name (but not the dependency) should be in bold, rather than quoted - -Qc: the package name should be in bold, rather than quoted - -Qg, -Sg: the group name should be in blue; the package name should be in bold - -Qk, -Qkk: the package name should be in bold - -Qo, -Fo: the package name should be in bold; the version number should be in green - -Qq, -Fq, -Sq: the package name should (possibly) be in bold - -T: the package name should (possibly) be in bold -- Regards, Xavion.
