On 09/10/16 20:29, Rikard Falkeborn wrote: >>> Why not move it to util/parseopts.sh if it should be moved into > libmakepkg? >>> >> I suppose that makes sense. util/util.sh ("General utility functions") > may also be appropriate if we don't want to create a new file. > > Why do you want to move it to libmakepkg? Isn't library a more suitable > place? From the README: "This directory contains code snippets that can be > reused by multiple scripts" >
If only scripts in libmakepkg could also be used in multiple places...