On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 07:40:14PM -0500, Dave Reisner wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 11:59:30PM +0000, morganamilo wrote:
> > This helpers functions allows checking for the existence of a package
> > variable without worrying if it is an array or not.
> 
> Seems reasonable, but where would this be used? Is this meant to
> consolidate existing cases of redundant code? Under what circumstances
> do we care about the variable existing without needing to know if it's
> an array or not?
> 

Ok, I see the followup patch where this is used. IMO, the patch using
this function for the first time ought to be also responsible for
defining it.

> > Signed-off-by: morganamilo <[email protected]>
> > ---
> >  scripts/libmakepkg/util/pkgbuild.sh.in | 9 +++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/scripts/libmakepkg/util/pkgbuild.sh.in 
> > b/scripts/libmakepkg/util/pkgbuild.sh.in
> > index b29229a3..f9fc440b 100644
> > --- a/scripts/libmakepkg/util/pkgbuild.sh.in
> > +++ b/scripts/libmakepkg/util/pkgbuild.sh.in
> > @@ -98,6 +98,15 @@ extract_function_variable() {
> >     return $r
> >  }
> >  
> > +exists_function_variable() {
> > +   # $1: function name
> > +   # $2: variable name
> > +
> > +   local funcname=$1 attr=$2 out
> > +   extract_function_variable "$funcname" "$attr" 0 out || \
> 
> The explicit line continuation isn't needed here -- || at the end of the
> line indicates a compound command that needs more tokens to be lexed
> before bash can complete the input.
> 
> > +           extract_function_variable "$funcname" "$attr" 1 out
> > +}
> > +
> >  get_pkgbuild_attribute() {
> >     # $1: package name
> >     # $2: attribute name
> > -- 
> > 2.20.1

Reply via email to