Hi Andrew, > Based on your description, this sounds like a case of "I was mildly > curious about something this one time
No, it would have been useful to know. There's no need to overly weaken it. > I understand the desire, but there are already tools to find what a > package optionally depends on and what optionally depends on a > package. Have you one in mind? It's not pactree(1), I checked that first. > Before we start bloating every user's log with extraneous information Point taken, though looking at pacman.log, it would be very slight bloat given all its existing content. -- Cheers, Ralph.
