On 4/5/20 1:19 PM, @RubenKelevra wrote: > I was wondering if there's interest from you or the team to implement > native IPFS support in pacman? > > The idea is, to extend the current database definition, by an > additional field, which holds the Content-ID necessary to fetch a > package from IPFS. >
If the database gets extended by an additional field for every new network layer people come up with, where do we draw the line? This needs a solution that does not require the database format to be altered to suit protocol-specific metadata. > > Best regards, > > Ruben > -R
