On 27/12/21 08:01, [email protected] wrote:
From: Jeremy Huntwork <[email protected]>
This is a proof of concept that shows how asignify can be used instead
of gpgme to validate packages signed with the asignify tool.
I'm not doing a full review of the patch (although I note some pure
whitespace changes creeping in).
This looks a reasonable approach to include. Note it would need to be
setup as an either/or with gpgme, much like the openssl/nettle
implementations are.
If you go ahead and work this into a formal patchset submission (please
not all one patch!), I can provide specific comments.
Cheers,
Allan
