On 2013-03-21 11:11, Chris Marshall wrote: > Hi all- > > As someone who routinely finds modules > that sound great but the fine print ends up > being something like "win32 users, don't bother" > I vote for at least a work around for the specific > issue for the release. > > Waiting for an upstream fix for a module you > don't control can be unpredictable. In this case, > what about requiring the non-broken version for > this release? It could be made conditional on > the platform if needed or desired. > > Regards, > Chris > > On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 6:47 AM, kevin dawson <[email protected]> wrote: >> On 2013-03-21 10:13, Sebastian Willing wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I'ld vote for not publishing a release which will fail to install somewhere. >> >> Many Padre users are Perl beginners, our highest priority should be a >> working "cpan Padre". >> >> Just my 2ct... >> >> Sebastian >> >> On 21.03.2013 10:52, Ahmad Zawawi wrote: >> >> Hi Peter, >> >> The real question is do we actually need to use IO::Socket::IP in >> Debug::Client or not? Does it provide us with a functionality that is >> not available in the previous implementation? >> >> Ahmad >> >> >> 2013/3/21 Peter Lavender <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> >> >> Hi Everyone, >> >> So it seems we have an issue with the version of Socket causing problems >> with IO::Socket::IP on some machines. >> >> At least one such machine is my XP box here as I was unable to get Padre >> installed. >> >> This can be over come by downgrading the version of Socket: >> >> cpanm -v >> http://cpan.metacpan.org/authors/id/P/PE/PEVANS/Socket-2.006.tar.gz >> >> So my main question here is, should be continue to release knowing this, >> or look to having Socket fixed before we release? >> >> On that note, has anyone lodged a bug report to the author about it? >> >> Peter. >> _______________________________________________ >> Padre-dev mailing list >> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >> http://mail.perlide.org/mailman/listinfo/padre-dev >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Padre-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://mail.perlide.org/mailman/listinfo/padre-dev >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Padre-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://mail.perlide.org/mailman/listinfo/padre-dev >> >> Hi All >> >> I think we should release, >> >> I have spoken to PEVANS via e-mail before re: IO::Socket::IP, these are the >> problems encounterd by a inux dev :) >> >> win32 users don't summit RT's >> win32 users don't generator CPAN Reports >> >> >> roll back to IO::Socket::INET 2009-05-09, no >> >> most win32 Padre user are using DWIMPerl, hence no problem, >> >> we known the solution to fix, so no problem >> >> I think we should release now, do we really want to wait another 3 months >> for another bug then another ... >> >> regards >> bowtie >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Padre-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://mail.perlide.org/mailman/listinfo/padre-dev >> > _______________________________________________ > Padre-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.perlide.org/mailman/listinfo/padre-dev > you do relise we are talking about http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_XP
Win-XP 2001-2006 Padre depends on Perl 5.10 2009-08-23 this is a non issue regards bowtie ps Socket 2.006 dose not expect to find an ip6 stack, XP dose not have an ip6 stack by default. _______________________________________________ Padre-dev mailing list [email protected] http://mail.perlide.org/mailman/listinfo/padre-dev
