On Wed, 7 Apr 1999, Alan Pinstein wrote: > Palm OS was developed in 1992-1995 if I remember correctly. Is that about > right? I don't remember 1995 that well ;) but I don't recall saying Y2K > that much. Besides, the way I figure it, I'll probably release a new > version of my apps sometime between now and 2031... my point exactly. i dont see microsoft still trying to sell MSDOS 3.3 (but then again.... you never know microsoft - it is still the same OS.. just has more 'features' (bugs)). az. -- Aaron Ardiri Lecturer http://www.hig.se/~ardiri/ University-College i G�vle mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] SE 801 76 G�vle SWEDEN Tel: +46 26 64 87 38 Fax: +46 26 64 87 88 Mob: +46 70 352 8192 A/H: +46 26 10 16 11
- RE: y2k bug inherent in DateType? Alan Johnson
- Re: y2k bug inherent in DateType? Chuck Christensen
- Re: y2k bug inherent in DateType? Steve Patt
- RE: y2k bug inherent in DateType? Shaolin Hu
- Re: y2k bug inherent in DateType? Marcel Guldemond
- Re: y2k bug inherent in DateType? Alan Pinstein
- Re: y2k bug inherent in DateType? Steve Patt
- Re: y2k bug inherent in DateType? Kenneth Albanowski
- RE: y2k bug inherent in DateType? Tom Zerucha
- RE: y2k bug inherent in DateType? Aaron Ardiri
- y2k bug inherent in DateType? Aaron Ardiri
- y2k bug inherent in DateType? Michael Hutchens
- Re: y2k bug inherent in DateType? Aaron Ardiri
- Re: y2k bug inherent in DateType? krollin
- Re: y2k bug inherent in DateType? Michael S. Davis
- Re: y2k bug inherent in DateType? Aaron Ardiri
- Re: y2k bug inherent in DateType? Aaron Ardiri
- Re: y2k bug inherent in DateType? krollin
- Re: y2k bug inherent in DateType? Laurence Lundblade
- Re: y2k bug inherent in DateType? Kenneth Albanowski
- Re: y2k bug inherent in DateType? Sudipta Ghose
