i think this discussion has gone a bit too far.. so we
all use different development environments.. fine.
if person X pays $360.00 US for CW, and person Y pays
nothing for gcc, and person Z pays XXX for Jump or
whatever.. so what?
your choice..
i use gcc because it suits my needs.
who really matters here? you or everyone else? no-one
is going to convince me to pay money for a program that
looks like a Mac.. runs like a dog.. and does not
meet my requirements.
i am happy with gcc.. hence i use it.
> It is true, that gdb is extreamely poor at GUI. But, if your trouble
> is this, then use Emacs, and use gdb on Emacs. You'll have
> confortable UI there. If you environment allows you xemacs, you can
> even have GUI, and that, better then CW debugger.
> #After all, you need emacs anytime you use any software from FSF,
> #or base on software from FSF.
oh boy.. i knew this one would come up.
emacs?
lets run an operating system in its own right. i know some
people love emacs.. and i dont care if they use it.
but... i use gcc.. and i use 'vi'.
why? because i spent 4 years of my life learning it.. and
now i know it.. i know how powerfull it is.. :))
just remember.. in the old days.. everyone had to use
vi in-order to get emacs compiled.
lets drop this conversation.. i think everyones point
of view is out there (even mine).. :))
lets get onto talking about writing some real programs.
:))
cheers.
az.
--
Aaron Ardiri
Lecturer http://www.hig.se/~ardiri/
University-College i G�vle mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
SE 801 76 G�vle SWEDEN
Tel: +46 26 64 87 38 Fax: +46 26 64 87 88
Mob: +46 70 352 8192 A/H: +46 26 10 16 11
