>This could work, but the struct would have to be larger than what you're >thinking. Yep, I forgot that you need a char[32] for the db's name. I was figuring something like: creator 4 bytes name 32 bytes uniquieID 4 bytes USERDATA - 20bytes (this should be plenty for everyone to use at their own discretion.) Alan
- Universal Linking Mechanism C. E. Steuart Dewar
- Re: Universal Linking Mechanism Daniel McCarty
- Re: Universal Linking Mechanism Sudipta Ghose
- Re: Universal Linking Mechanism Ben Darnell
- Re: Universal Linking Mechanism Alan Pinstein
- Re: Universal Linking Mechanism Ben Darnell
- RE: Universal Linking Mechanism Alan Johnson
- Re: Universal Linking Mechanism Alan Pinstein
- Re: Universal Linking Mechanism Alan Pinstein
- Re: Universal Linking Mechanism Greg Winton
- Re: Universal Linking Mechanism C. E. Steuart Dewar
- Re: Universal Linking Mechanism Ben Darnell
- Re: Universal Linking Mechanism Daniel McCarty
- Re: Universal Linking Mechanism Daniel McCarty
- Re: Universal Linking Mechanism Ben Darnell
- Re: Universal Linking Mechanism Kenneth Albanowski
- RE: Universal Linking Mechanism Richard Hartman
- Re: Universal Linking Mechanism Creative Digital Publishing Inc.
