Richard Hartman wrote: > > any ptrs? > > Funny you should say that. Pointers are exactly what you want. > > Make your function take a pointer to the struct type. yeah i was trying to make a joke :) guess someone got it. i did use ptrs and it worked great, saved 2600 bytes, made the code easier to read. i was just unsure about it as i seem to remember someone recently saying that structs shouldnt be passed in function parameters. :P
- stupid (?) C question pete moss
- RE: stupid (?) C question Neil Brown
- Re: RE: stupid (?) C question ron
- Re: RE: stupid (?) C question ron
- RE: stupid (?) C question Richard Hartman
- Re: stupid (?) C question pete moss
- Re: stupid (?) C question Aaron Ardiri
