> > After playing around with this for a little while (getting it to work
> > under Win32) it definitely seems to be the better approach. It
> > eliminates
> > Pila from the mix, which is a plus when all the code is in C anyway.
> > Pila usually creates two dummy code resources with id's 0 and 1, at 8
> > bytes apiece, so that's just wasted space. Compiling and gluing with
> > GCC only
> > results in a smaller PRC, too.
>
> i believe it is the other way around :> gcc adds '0x0001' just before
> the 'start()' routine.
i just re-read that again.. talking about different things :>
gcc and other compilers add two extra bytes at the beginning of the
code - which was what i was talking about.. as for the resources,
never noticed it.
:>
az.
--
Aaron Ardiri
Lecturer http://www.hig.se/~ardiri/
University-College i G�vle mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
SE 801 76 G�vle SWEDEN
Tel: +46 26 64 87 38 Fax: +46 26 64 87 88
Mob: +46 70 352 8192 A/H: +46 26 10 16 11
