At 11:03 AM 9/23/99 -0700, you wrote: >>You kill the app if it lets exceptions out... > >That'd be great in theory. In practice, not all compilers and languages >support exceptions, and I'm unsure as to whether the OS should >mandate/enforce one way of implementing exceptions. > PalmOS mandates a whole bunch of other things, why not exception handling? It's a mistake to say that you're not going to do something because no one can currently handle it. If that was logical, you wouldn't have developed the OS in the first place, after all, no-one was writing applications for it before you started.
- PalmOS improvements (was: C++ SDK wanted!) Andreas Linke
- Re: PalmOS improvements (was: C++ SDK wanted!) krollin
- Re: PalmOS improvements (was: C++ SDK wanted!) Michael Yam
- Re: PalmOS improvements (was: C++ SDK wanted!) Jason Dawes
- Re: PalmOS improvements (was: C++ SDK wanted!) David Fedor
- Re: PalmOS improvements (was: C++ SDK wanted!) Jason Dawes
- Re: PalmOS improvements (was: C++ SDK wanted!) David Fedor
- Re: PalmOS improvements (was: C++ SDK wanted!) Jason Dawes
- Re: PalmOS improvements (was: C++ SDK wanted!) B. Flaumenhaft
- Re: PalmOS improvements (was: C++ SDK wanted!) Chris Antos
- RE: PalmOS improvements (was: C++ SDK wanted!) Richard Hartman
- Re: PalmOS improvements (was: C++ SDK wanted!) Jason Dawes
- Re: PalmOS improvements (was: C++ SDK wanted!) Roger Chaplin
- Re: PalmOS improvements (was: C++ SDK wanted!) Bill Goodman
- Re: PalmOS improvements (was: C++ SDK wanted!) David Fedor
- RE: PalmOS improvements (was: C++ SDK wanted!) Richard Hartman
