Marcus,
Right now I am using GCC 0.5 so I guess that it is not fixed in this
version.
Mike
> ----------
> From: Marcus Blankenship[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, November 18, 1999 11:13 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: CALLBACK_PROLOGUE
>=20
> I thought the newest version of the GCC compiler fixed that...
>=20
> > ----------
> > From: Aaron Ardiri[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Thursday, November 18, 1999 7:28 AM
> > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> > Subject: Re: CALLBACK_PROLOGUE
> >=20
> > > Hi,
> > >=20
> > > I have been looking at a lot of source code recently and noticed =
that
> > some
> > > people put in CALLBACK_PROLOGUE and CALLBACK_EPILOGUE in their =
code.
> Why
> > is
> > > that? When should it be done? What happens if I don't do it?
> >=20
> > it is only required with GCC compilers.. as the compiler clobbers
> > the a4 register when you write call back routines.. :>
> >=20
> > if you dont do it under GCC and you access a global variable.
> > expect a few FATAL EXCEPTIONS :>=20
> >=20
> > az.=20
> > --
> > Aaron Ardiri=20
> > Lecturer http://www.hig.se/~ardiri/
> > University-College i G=E4vle mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > SE 801 76 G=E4vle SWEDEN =20
> > Tel: +46 26 64 87 38 Fax: +46 26 64 87 88
> > Mob: +46 70 656 1143 A/H: +46 26 10 16 11
> >=20
> >=20
>=20
