At 3:18 AM -0800 12/18/02, Mark Wilden wrote:
Yes, but it doesn't take too much of a stretch of the imagination to realize that he could add that, too (as well as the nothrow instance of nothrow_t). I was just trying to show him that he could add the pieces he needed if he wanted (and if they were, in fact, missing). I didn't think it necessary to iterate all of those pieces.If he were missing this declaration, I'd think he'd be missing std::nothrow_t too, wouldn't he?
-- Keith
--
For information on using the Palm Developer Forums, or to unsubscribe, please see http://www.palmos.com/dev/support/forums/
