On Wed, 9 Aug 2006 13:44:19 -0500 Benjamin Esham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just to clarify… are the unread headers supposed to be underlined? > Threads with unread are underlined when collapsed, but there is no > underline once these threads are expanded. Here's how it works, at least, how I think it works. :) With collapsed threads: Bold = Completely unread thread Normal = Read thread Normal + underline = Read thread with new messages Following the header, the (#) in parenthesis is the number of unread messages in the collapsed thread. Once the thread is expanded, you don't need the (#) or underline so they aren't visible. I guess the underline is slightly redundant now that we have (#) back, because if you have a normal thread with (#), you already know it's a read thread with new messages. -- Hoi, noch eine Bloat-Reimplementation auf ossp.org und sie ist _nicht_ von Engelschall? Wie kommt es? -- Felix von Leitner in de.comp.os.unix.programming 2002-04-18 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ Pan-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pan-users
