On Sun, 17 Jul 2011 08:37:28 +0000, Duncan wrote: > Benjamin Esham posted on Sat, 16 Jul 2011 19:42:08 +0000 as excerpted: > >> Pan has a built-in mechanism for ignoring an author, i.e. scoring all >> of their posts at -9999. I see two (related) problems with the current >> implementation: first, that the "blocked" posts are not actually marked >> as read, > > This one's interesting. Here's the situation. > > (....) > > The tab could then look something like this, > taking the idea from how the scoring UI works: > > (As a tooltip: Here you can configure pan to take certain actions on > your behalf automatically, based on a post's score.) > > --------------------8><------------------ > > Automatically: > > Delete posts scoring at or below [dropdown menu] > > Mark-read posts scoring at or below [dropdown menu] > > Cache posts scoring at least [dropdown menu] > > Save attachments scoring at least [dropdown menu] > > --------------------><8------------------ > > The dropdown menu would then look like this: > > (Disabled) > <=-9999 (Ignored) > -9998 to -1 (Low) > 0 (Normal) > +1 to +4999 (Medium) > +5000 to +9998 (High) >>=+9999 (Watched) > > > Everybody, including Charles I believe, thought something like that was > *MUCH* simpler than rules had been, and that it would be a good > replacement for rules. >
Working on it ;) It's working, but not fully automatic yet. I can delete and mark articles unread at will now. Stay tuned. -- roses are 0xff0000, violets are 0x0000ff, all my base are belong to you... _______________________________________________ Pan-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pan-users
