Hi Alper,
I share the same opinion with Rafa.
regards,
victor
Dear Alper, all
I have been reviewing both documents. For me, the documents reflects
properly the proposed and discussed changes. I think now they are
simpler and understandable (even when pana-fwk suffered a major surgery).
My 0.01 cents.
Alper Yegin wrote:
pana-pana and pana-framework documents are revised based on the IETF
last
call comments.
http://panasec.org/docs/editing/draft-ietf-pana-framework-07a.txt
http://panasec.org/docs/editing/draft-ietf-pana-framework-07a-from-6.diff.ht
ml (side-by-side diff from version 06)
http://panasec.org/docs/editing/draft-ietf-pana-pana-12a.txt
http://panasec.org/docs/editing/draft-ietf-pana-pana-12a-from-1.diff.html
(side-by-side diff from version 11)
Please take a look at them and let the WG know if you find any
problems, by
Aug 16. We'll submit the documents to IESG review after than.
- Chairs
_______________________________________________
Pana mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pana
_______________________________________________
Pana mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pana
