I don't see a good reason why we should deviate from the process. Alper
> -----Original Message----- > From: Glen Zorn (gwz) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2006 2:12 AM > To: Alper Yegin; Mark Townsley (townsley) > Cc: Jari Arkko; [email protected] > Subject: RE: [Pana] Revised I-Ds to IESG > > > Hi Mark, > > PANA WG has completed revising the two WG documents based on the IETF > last call feedback. Could you please take them to IESG review now? > > GWZ> Wouldn't a more appropriate next step be another IETF Last Call? _______________________________________________ Pana mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pana
