Alper and PANA WG,
I apologize for being unresponsive to our thread over the past week and
a half, I was traveling with my family though had hoped to retain enough
contact with this issue to continue to respond in relative real-time.
Unfortunately, we all came down with the flu on our trip, which made
things far more difficult than I had expected.
We are well and back home now. Aside of the basic administration run-up
to the IETF (which of course includes time-consuming tasks like BoF
agendas and plenaries) I will be focusing with you on converging these
last items so that we can finally get the new (and hopefully improved)
version of the PANA specification in front of the IETF and IESG soon.
- Mark
Alper Yegin wrote:
Mark,
I believe we iterated one more round in response to your e-mails on PANA
issues. Could you process the e-mails and let us know what you think?
Once we converge on all, I'll send a summary message on the list and we'll
revise the document accordingly.
Alper
_______________________________________________
Pana mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pana
