If you look in capo, there are scripts called "batch_mk_df_images.sh" capable of doing this, e.g. https://github.com/dannyjacobs/capo/blob/master/dfm/scripts/batch_mk_df_images.sh
Saul Aryeh Kohn PhD student University of Pennsylvania ----------------------------------------- ZOO David Rittenhouse Laboratory 209 South 33rd Street Philadelphia PA, 19104 On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 5:51 PM, Chris Carilli <[email protected]> wrote: > would be interesting to see how far we could push the 'confusion noise' > primary beam measurement. I am sure this would never be an accurate way of > measuring the primary beam, but it could serve as a quick and easy way to > get a handle of the gross size and shape of the mean primary beam from > first images of eg. HERA, in the absence of more involved processes. > > to test the idea further, what I would need data sets within like +/- > 15min of a transit time when the Sun, Cygnus a, and Galactic plane are all > down. looks like in the data i got from Jonnie, the latest file (63640) the > Gal plane is 60 deg past transit. if there were time ranges a bit later, > but before sunrise, that would be tremendous. > > I would need the format that Jonnie generated -- compression and first > calibration pass. might be useful to have all the imaging data converted > into FITS files, so as others analyze how they see fit? doesn't take a lot > of space, but might take some time to convert? > > chris > > > On 11/26/2014 02:16 PM, Saul Kohn wrote: > > That's a question for the "paperdata" database... > > There's raw data on Julian days 2455742 thru 2455749 in > /data3/paper/psa/Jul2011/ (except for psa745, which seems to be in > /data4/raw_data/Jul2011/...) > > Check-out > https://github.com/immanuelw/paperdata/blob/master/table_descr.txt, which > points you to at least the raw data. I don't know where the compressed > stuff is... > > > Saul Aryeh Kohn > > PhD student > University of Pennsylvania > ----------------------------------------- > ZOO > David Rittenhouse Laboratory > 209 South 33rd Street > Philadelphia PA, 19104 > > On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 3:57 PM, danny jacobs <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> hm, thats an interesting idea, though we probably have to integrate >> longer to get to confusion limit far out in the beam... Would need a good >> many repeated nights. Can't remember how many 64 imaging nights we got. >> James? >> > >
