# from m.nooning
# on Monday 29 January 2007 08:53 am:
>Another thing, with the original t1.pl, which has a "use mylib" in it,
...
>The resultant a.exe ran fine, so it looks like pp will pick up mylib
>without "--lib mylib" on the pp command line. At least if the
> directory mylib is in the current directory.
When compiling or executing, yes. This is because the END block of the
subprocess reports the final @INC. However, I believe you must have
the --lib switch for anything included via -M or static scanning.
Also, I'm pretty certain will be no mylib directory in the par. That's
probably not a problem in most cases, but if your code checks for
existence of that directory, you could get into trouble. (Note that if
you include it via -a that you'll probably just end up with two copies
of the modules because the scan will see them get loaded and pp will
stick them in lib/.)
Yes, the PERL5LIB workaround is still required when compiling. Who
wants to write some tests for Module::ScanDeps?
--Eric
--
Cult: A small, unpopular religion.
Religion: A large, popular cult.
-- Unknown
---------------------------------------------------
http://scratchcomputing.com
---------------------------------------------------
