Thanks Guys. I will give a try today. I will let you know the results.
Your support is the best !! On 1/7/08, Scott Stanton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Ideally we'd hash the file contents, but that's going to be too slow to > do on every startup. Checking the expected size is a good compromise. > It's a fast sanity check that should catch the most common problems. > > --Scott > > -----Original Message----- > From: Steffen Mueller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, January 07, 2008 11:52 AM > To: Scott Stanton > Cc: Henry Wu; par@perl.org > Subject: Re: problem with pp > > Hi Scott, > > thanks for chiming in. > > Scott Stanton schrieb: > > I think the problem can be resolved with the following patch. Give it > a > > try and let me know how it goes. > > I think your patch resolves the specific issue. However, is there a case > > where testing -f might not be enough? Should we make sure the size is > the same just in case a extraction was interrupted? > > Best regards, > Steffen >
