On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 1:02 PM, Roderich Schupp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > AFAICT, no. But I think this is a useful suggestion:
Scrap that. I just tried a very simple example (version 0.980 on Solaris 9): $ pp -o foo.exe -e "print qq[INC [EMAIL PROTECTED];" and PERL5LIB is _not_ propagated to foo.exe: when I run $ set PERL5LIB=/some/where $ ./foo.exe INC = CODE(0x6df76c) CODE(0x6df958) i.e. /some/where _doesn't_ show up in @INC Can you try this example? And what version of PAR and PAR::Packer are you using? Cheers, Roderich
