On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 1:25 PM, Thomas Sattler <[email protected]> wrote:
> Even so I'm still unhappy with the idea of "one separate > ssh login per job". How about letting parallel doing the > multiplexing on its own, running a shell or perl on the > remote host to spawn the jobs? I do not see how that would be possible. How would you implement --transfer and --return? I believe it may also make it harder to determine whether a job failed, and thus make it harder to do --retries and --halt correctly. /Ole
