On 24 April 2013 21:01, Hans Schou <[email protected]> wrote: > My idea was to stop the other jobs when the first one complete. They do > get stopped but it is not the right result which is printed. Im sorry I can > not come any closer but it might be posssible to do it. >
Thanks a lot for trying to help! Dynamically updating a timeout is quite tricky in general. GNU parallel is great for so many things, I find myself wanting more and more from it. Cheers, -- Ozgur Akgun
