Apologies for jumping the gun, it looks like I got the parenthesis to work using the right combination of quotes. Nonetheless, such a replacement string might be useful!
On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 4:21 PM, Geoffrey Cleaves <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi all. Is there a replacement string similar to {//} which *keeps only > the extension?* I know it's possible to define a custom replacement > pattern but I'm running into difficulties since I have so many nested > shells and my matching parenthesis aren't being recognised. > > Thanks! >
