Hi Jérôme, Thanks for your answer. It helps, but the pvsm file stored contains really every ParaView settings.
I am going to study closely its content: do you know if some data are optional in the sense, if there is no value in the pvsm file, a default value considered instead by ParaView? Actually, I'm not interested in most of the data in the pvsm file I saved because I would like then start from a pvsm file to execute ParaView in batch, and save the results in vtk xml file for instance. Thus, the only data which would be kept are nearly all related to the filters used, and only them. For other settings, defaut values are ok: they do not actually to be set. Currently, the only additional important information I see is the increment at which filters have to be applied. As I foresee to write then the pvsm file from another application, I would like to simplify it as much as possible. I have tried "cleaning" the obtained pvsm file, keeping only the tags related to the filters I have been using, but it doesn't work well: when loaded back, ParaView hangs on the screen "Create View" (3D View, 2D View, ...) I'm gonna do some experiments to see what can be cleaned or not. I thank you again for your help. Regards, Pierre 2009/1/24 Jérôme <jerome.ve...@gmail.com> > Hi, > > When I use "Save state", I have this result. Isn't it the case for you? > My pvsm files contain the user parameters and pipelines (except maybe > the writer, but I used to use "Save data" from the file menu, so they > are not really in the pipeline..) > > Regards, > Jerome > > 2009/1/24 Pierre JUILLARD <pierre.juill...@gmail.com>: > > Hi all, > > > > > > I am wondering if it is possible to export a ParaView session in a file, > > which could then be loaded back for execution. > > I mean is there a way to save all user choices of the session pipeline, > such > > that it could be executed again once reloaded in ParaView? > > The result file produced could be close to a pvsm file, but with user > values > > for each user inputs needed to set readers filters, and writters working. > It > > would describe the chain of plugins that was previously run, as well as > all > > their input data. > > > > I thank you in advance for your help. > > Cheers, > > > > > > Pierre > > > > _______________________________________________ > > ParaView mailing list > > ParaView@paraview.org > > http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview > > > > >
_______________________________________________ ParaView mailing list ParaView@paraview.org http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview